Close Menu
  • Home
  • Altcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Crypto
  • Forex
  • Online Money
What's Hot

op return – What is the justification for allowing multiple OP_RETURN outputs per transaction in Bitcoin Core v30?

October 4, 2025

Highest Lowest MT4 Indicator – ForexMT4Indicators.com

October 4, 2025

Google Search serving issue in some locales

October 4, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Altcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Crypto
  • Forex
  • Online Money
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Cointelegraphe
  • Home
  • Altcoin
  • Bitcoin
  • Crypto
  • Forex
  • Online Money
Cointelegraphe
Home»Bitcoin»segregated witness – Why doesn’t my Taproot transaction builder (buildTaprootTx using @cmdcode/tapscript) work as expected?
segregated witness – Why doesn’t my Taproot transaction builder (buildTaprootTx using @cmdcode/tapscript) work as expected?
Bitcoin

segregated witness – Why doesn’t my Taproot transaction builder (buildTaprootTx using @cmdcode/tapscript) work as expected?

adminBy adminAugust 9, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


I wrote the following function to build and sign Taproot (P2TR) transactions using @cmdcode/tapscript. My intention is to support both key-path and script-path spends, and optionally both together.

The problem is that it doesn’t work as expected:

Script-path spends often fail to validate (e.g., control block errors, invalid witness, or failed script execution).

Can someone review my code and point out what’s wrong with my logic or implementation?
I’d especially appreciate advice on how to fix script-path failures and any performance improvements for the key-path case.

import { Address, Signer, Tap, Tx } from '@cmdcode/tapscript';

protected buildTaprootTx(
  senderKey: { publicKey: Uint8Array; privateKey: Uint8Array },
  utxos: Array<{ txid: string; vout: number; value: number }>,
  recipient: string,
  amountSat: number,
  feeSat: number,
  mode: 'key' | 'script' | 'both',
  scriptLeaves: Array = [],
  opReturnData?: Uint8Array | string,
  changeAddr?: string
): string {
  // ... (full code as in my gist, see link below)
}

full code

Questions:

  • What am I doing wrong, especially regarding script-path spending?

  • Is there a better way to structure or optimize the function for
    performance and correctness?

  • If you spot any obvious bugs or misunderstandings in how I use
    Taproot key/script path logic, please point them out.

Any code review, suggestions, or working example references are highly appreciated. Thank you!



Source link

builder buildTaprootTx cmdcodetapscript Doesnt expected segregated Taproot transaction Witness work
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
admin
  • Website

Related Posts

op return – What is the justification for allowing multiple OP_RETURN outputs per transaction in Bitcoin Core v30?

October 4, 2025

XRP’s Next Rally Predicted To Shock Markets

October 2, 2025

FOMC Rate Cuts Loom As Bitcoin Holds Above $109,500 EMA

October 1, 2025

NYDFS Chief Harris to Leave New York Regulator Next Month

September 30, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Insights

op return – What is the justification for allowing multiple OP_RETURN outputs per transaction in Bitcoin Core v30?

October 4, 2025

Highest Lowest MT4 Indicator – ForexMT4Indicators.com

October 4, 2025

Google Search serving issue in some locales

October 4, 2025

BTC Nears Record Highs as Total Market Cap Peaks at $4.21T

October 4, 2025
ads

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from Cointelegraphe about Crypto, bItcoin and Altcoin.

About Us
About Us

At CoinTelegraphe, we are dedicated to bringing you the latest and most insightful news, analysis, and updates from the dynamic world of cryptocurrency. Our mission is to provide our readers with accurate, timely, and comprehensive information to help them navigate the complexities of the crypto market.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
Top Insights

op return – What is the justification for allowing multiple OP_RETURN outputs per transaction in Bitcoin Core v30?

October 4, 2025

Highest Lowest MT4 Indicator – ForexMT4Indicators.com

October 4, 2025

Google Search serving issue in some locales

October 4, 2025
Get Informed

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from Cointelegraphe about Crypto, bItcoin and Altcoin.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Copyright 2024 Cointelegraphe Design By Horaam Sultan.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.