Timothy Cradle, former director of financial crimes compliance at Celsius, has accused the lender of deliberately manipulating the price of the CEL token.
Jason Stone, the head of a firm that managed over $2 billion for Celsius, separately accused the lender of price manipulation in a lawsuit filed July 7.
Share this article
Celsius’ former financial crimes compliance director told CNBC that the beleaguered lender was dealing with a range of internal failures years before it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Celsius Faces Market Manipulation Allegations
Celsius deliberately manipulated the price of its CEL token, one of the firm’s former executives has claimed.
In a Tuesday CNBC interview, the former financial crimes compliance director at Celsius, Timothy Cradle, said he had overheard other company executives discussing “pumping up the CEL token” at a company Christmas party in 2019. According to Cradle, the executives spoke openly about their activities, and he said that similar conversations came up on at least two other occasions. “I don’t know a better way to phrase it, but they were in the market; they were actively trading and increasing the price of the [CEL] token,” Cradle said in the interview. “They were absolutely trading the token to manipulate the price.”
Cradle isn’t the only person familiar with the lender’s operations to accuse the company of engaging in potentially illegal market manipulation. Earlier this month, Jason Stone, the head of KeyFi, a firm that managed over $2 billion in crypto assets on behalf of Celsius, sued Celsius alleging the firm had failed to pay KeyFi for its services. In the lawsuit, Stone said that the lender engaged in multiple harmful and illegal business practices, including market manipulation, running a Ponzi scheme, and failing to implement basic accounting controls or risk management practices.
“The most egregious example of this was Plaintiff’s discovery that Celsius used customer bitcoin deposits to inflate its own crypto-asset called the ‘Celsius token,’” the lawsuit read. Stone also accused the lender of leveraging double-digit interest rates on its deposit accounts to “lure new depositors” and using those funds to repay earlier depositors and creditors, effectively running a Ponzi scheme.
Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author of this article owned ETH and several other cryptocurrencies.
Share this article
The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.
You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.
See full terms and conditions.